Discover folk - the CRM for people-powered businesses
A CRM can hold thousands of contacts and still leave sales reps switching between their inbox, phone system, and a spreadsheet of follow-ups. Close brings those activities into the CRM itself. For teams that spend much of the day calling prospects, that is a practical advantage.
But built-in communication tools are only part of the buying decision. The plan you need, the cost of usage, and the way your team builds relationships matter just as much.
This Close CRM review covers its main features, current pricing, strengths, and trade-offs, then explains when folk CRM may be a better fit.
Close CRM review: Key Takeaways
- Best fit: Sales teams that rely on regular calling, email, and SMS to move prospects through a defined sales process.
- Main advantage: Communication and sales activity live alongside lead records, reducing the work of maintaining a separate outreach stack.
- Pricing: Four plans, from $9 to $139 per user per month with annual billing. Solo is limited to one user.
- Important trade-off: The entry plans do not include automated workflows. Calling, SMS, and additional AI usage can increase the total bill.
- Alternative to consider: folk CRM for teams that want prospect capture, enrichment, conversation context, and follow-ups connected in a shared workspace.
What is Close CRM?
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐(G2)
Close is a sales CRM with built-in calling, email, SMS, and pipeline management. Formerly known as Close.io, it is designed to help reps work leads and manage sales conversations without constantly moving between tools.
Its appeal is clearest when outreach is a daily routine. A rep needs to contact a prospect, review previous exchanges, record the outcome, and decide what happens next. Close keeps those activities connected to the lead.
That focus also shapes the evaluation. A company looking for a CRM should ask whether it needs a system built around sales activity or a broader workspace for managing different kinds of relationships.
Who is Close CRM best for?
Close is worth shortlisting when phone conversations are a regular part of winning business.
Potential buyers include:
✅ Inside sales teams working through targeted call lists.
✅ SDRs and account executives combining calls with email follow-ups.
✅ Founders who handle sales themselves and want communication attached to their CRM records.
✅ Sales managers who need visibility into outreach activity and pipeline progress.
Team size alone is a poor selection rule. A five-person team making calls throughout the day may get more value from Close than a larger team selling through referrals, partnerships, and occasional meetings.
Start with the work your reps repeat every week. If calling sits near the center of that work, Close deserves a closer look.
Close CRM features explained!
Built-in calling and sales dialers
Calling is one of the clearest reasons to choose Close. Reps can make calls from the CRM and keep the activity attached to the relevant record. They do not have to reconstruct the conversation history across a separate phone tool and contact database.
Close offers two distinct dialing approaches:
👉 Power Dialer: Calls leads sequentially, moving through the list one number at a time.
👉 Predictive Dialer: Dials multiple numbers and connects a rep when someone answers.
The Power Dialer is available on Growth, while the Predictive Dialer requires Scale.
Those differences matter when choosing a plan. A team doing occasional calls should not budget for the same setup as a team running dedicated calling sessions.
During an evaluation, use a representative lead list. Check whether the dialing workflow saves useful time between conversations and whether reps can record outcomes clearly. Faster dialing has limited value if the next steps still end up in a spreadsheet.
Email, SMS, and automated workflows
Close combines email and SMS with calling, giving teams several ways to continue a sales conversation.
Automated workflows become particularly useful when follow-ups have a repeatable structure. For example, a team might send an initial email, create a call task, and schedule another touch if the prospect has not responded.
A sensible evaluation should check more than whether a sequence can be launched. Ask what happens when a prospect replies, changes status, or becomes a customer. The workflow should reflect those changes rather than keep sending an outdated message.
Workflows are not included in Solo or Essentials. Teams buying Close specifically for sales automation should evaluate Growth or Scale.
Lead, contact, and pipeline management
Close organizes contacts within lead records and connects sales opportunities to that account context. This is useful when several people are involved in a buying decision.
Consider a deal with an operations manager, a finance contact, and a company founder. The CRM should help a rep understand those relationships while keeping the opportunity and communication history accessible.
When evaluating the setup, import a small sample containing:
- Several contacts from the same company.
- More than one opportunity associated with an account.
- Leads at different stages of qualification.
- Records with missing or inconsistent information.
This reveals more than an empty demo pipeline. It shows whether your team can find the right person, understand the account, and keep records usable as activity grows.
Sales reporting
Close provides reporting around opportunities, sales activity, and workflows. Managers can review pipeline stages, deal values, and rep activity without assembling everything manually.
The value depends on the questions you need answered. A useful report might show where deals stall, which opportunities need attention, or how activity differs across reps.
Activity counts still need interpretation. More calls do not automatically mean better qualification, and more emails do not guarantee stronger pipeline.
Before subscribing, define three decisions your manager needs to make every week. Then check whether Close provides the information needed for each one. That is a better test than counting dashboards.
Chloe and AI features
Chloe is Close’s built-in AI sales agent. Its capabilities include calling and qualifying leads, booking meetings, enriching records, and helping users work with CRM information.
Access is available across Close plans, with included AI credits. Growth and Scale unlock its use within workflows.
For a buyer, the useful question is which task the AI can handle reliably within the actual sales process. Qualification criteria, handoffs, and record updates should all be checked with representative examples.
Call transcription and summaries also need their own cost review. Close lists Call Assistant as an add-on; do not assume every AI capability is covered by the base subscription.
Marketing Automation Features
Close is primarily a sales-focused CRM, so it doesn't really have any basic marketing automation tools. You may need a separate tool that helps bridge the gap between sales and marketing teams. For newsletters and email campaigns, dedicated newsletter tools that connect to your CRM are worth a look.
Close CRM Official Pricing in 2026
Close offers Solo, Essentials, Growth, and Scale. The table below separates monthly subscriptions from the monthly equivalent of annual billing.
Is there a free plan?
Close offers a 14-day free trial rather than an ongoing free plan. Use the trial to check a complete sales workflow: import leads, contact prospects, manage replies, and review the reporting.
Which Close CRM plan should you choose?
The right Close plan depends on how your team sells. Start with the features reps need every day, then compare the subscription cost.
Solo: for founders handling sales themselves
Solo suits one person who wants contacts, emails, calls, and SMS in the same CRM. It supports up to 10,000 leads but does not include automated workflows.
At $9 per month with annual billing, it is an inexpensive way to organize founder-led sales. You will need another plan when a colleague joins the workspace or automated follow-ups become necessary.
Essentials: for teams managing outreach manually
Essentials adds team collaboration and removes the Solo lead limit. It costs $35 per user/month with annual billing.
Choose it if reps need shared records and built-in communication tools but can manage their own follow-up tasks. It is less suitable if the main reason for buying Close is to automate outreach: workflows are not included.
Growth: for repeatable outreach and regular calling
Growth includes automated workflows and the Power Dialer. It costs $99 per user/month with annual billing.
This is the plan to evaluate when reps work through call lists or follow a consistent outreach process. For example, a new lead receives an email, enters a follow-up workflow, and gets assigned a call task.
The price jump from Essentials is substantial. Before upgrading, identify which manual steps Growth would remove and how often your team performs them.
Scale: for teams that need predictive dialing
Scale costs $139 per user/month with annual billing and adds the Predictive Dialer and advanced controls.
Its clearest use case is a team running high-volume calling sessions. If reps make a few scheduled calls between meetings, predictive dialing may offer little value.
Budget reminder: These are subscription prices. Calling, SMS, additional AI usage, and optional add-ons can increase the bill.
Close CRM: Pros and Cons
Pros
👍 Communication stays connected to sales records. Built-in calling, email, and SMS can reduce the need to maintain several disconnected tools.
👍 Dialers support dedicated calling sessions. Teams that work through call lists have a clear reason to evaluate the higher plans.
👍 Managers can connect activity with pipeline progress. Reporting helps make outreach and opportunity data easier to review together.
👍 AI operates within the CRM context. Chloe can work with existing records rather than requiring a completely separate prospecting environment.
"What I’ve liked most about Close lately is how much more intelligent the platform has become without losing the simplicity that made me like it in the first place. The newer AI features, especially Chloe, are genuinely useful for keeping up with follow-ups, summarizing conversations, updating CRM data, and taking action on leads. I also really like the improvements around meeting management, workflows, and scheduling.
It feels less like a traditional CRM where you simply store information and more like a sales workspace that actually helps you move deals forward. For someone who spends a lot of time selling, that difference is huge. Close continues to make the day-to-day sales process faster and much more organized." Adhiraj, G2
Cons
👎 Automation changes the price calculation. A team that needs workflows must budget for Growth or Scale.
👎 Usage adds variability. The subscription total does not cover every calling, messaging, or AI expense.
👎 The sales focus may not match every team. Relationship-led teams should evaluate how well the setup supports partnerships, referrals, and less standardized opportunities.
👎 AI requires evaluation and supervision. A capability on a feature list is not proof that it will handle your qualification rules or handoffs correctly.
"The UX is a little dated (as I'm sure most CRMs are), the sequencing seems pretty basic, and you need a few other 3rd party systems (CMS and Integration Tool like Zapier) to make it work as a full-throttle CRM (it's mostly just a sales system based on my usage). It's hard to get to custom reports, and I get the sense that they are just starting with product management, etc." Jeff, G2.
Close CRM vs folk: Which Fits Your Sales Process?
Close and folk can both help B2B teams organize prospects and follow-ups. The better fit depends on how opportunities enter the pipeline and how conversations develop.
Close has a clear case when dedicated calling sessions are central to the process. folk connects prospect capture, enrichment, conversation history, and relationship management in a shared workspace.
When folk Makes More Sense
Choose folk if your team spends more time finding the right people and following up than working through call lists.
A typical example: a rep finds a decision-maker on LinkedIn, sends an email, then continues the discussion on WhatsApp. Another colleague joins the deal a week later. They need to see what was discussed and what is still pending.
folk supports that process with:
- LinkedIn prospect capture: Save contacts from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator with the folkX Chrome extension.
- Contact enrichment: Find email addresses and phone numbers without moving the list into a separate enrichment tool.
- Shared conversation history: Keep synced emails, WhatsApp exchanges, and notes accessible alongside contact records.
- AI assistance: Get relationship summaries and suggested follow-ups based on previous conversations.
Standard starts at $24 per user/month, billed annually. For teams that need email sequences, deals, dashboards, and API access, Premium starts at $48 per user/month, billed annually.
Give your team a clearer next step with folk
A prospect replies, asks for a proposal, then goes quiet. Who owns the follow-up? What did they ask for? Has someone already contacted them?
folk keeps those details with the contact. Reps can review the conversation, track the opportunity, and prepare their next message. Colleagues can pick up the account with the context already available.
Start the 14-day trial with the leads your team is working on this week.
Final verdict: is Close CRM worth it?
Close is worth considering if your reps make calls every day and need dialing, email, and SMS inside their CRM. Its calling tools are a clear reason to choose it. Just budget for the plan you need: workflows and the Power Dialer require Growth, while usage charges sit on top of the subscription.
For founders, agencies, and B2B teams that prospect on LinkedIn and build deals through ongoing conversations, folk is a compelling alternative. Contact capture, enrichment, shared history, and follow-up assistance address the work those teams do every day.
Choose Close for a calling-heavy sales process. Choose folk when prospecting and relationship management drive your pipeline!
Frequently asked questions
Is Close CRM worth it for small sales teams?
Close can be worth it when a small team regularly uses calling, email, and SMS to sell. Teams that need automated workflows should evaluate Growth or Scale and include usage costs in the budget. A smaller team with occasional outreach may not need those higher-tier features.
How much does Close CRM cost?
Close costs $9–$139 per user per month with annual billing, or $19–$149 with monthly billing, across Solo, Essentials, Growth, and Scale. Solo supports one user. Calling, SMS, additional AI usage, and optional add-ons can increase the total.
Does Close CRM have a free plan?
Close provides a 14-day free trial, not a permanent free plan. Continued use requires a paid subscription.
Which Close plan includes the Power Dialer?
The Power Dialer is included in Growth and Scale. The Predictive Dialer requires Scale. Teams should select a plan based on their calling workflow rather than assuming both dialers are available on every subscription.
Does Close CRM support WhatsApp?
Close’s core communication tools focus on calling, email, and SMS. If WhatsApp is essential, check the current integration options and what they support, including contact sync and conversation history. folk provides WhatsApp contact and conversation synchronization.
When should you choose folk instead of Close?
Consider folk when prospect capture, enrichment, shared conversation context, and relationship follow-ups are central to your sales process. Close is particularly relevant when built-in calling and dedicated sales dialers are priorities.
More resources
Meet folk, the AI CRM for your entire Sales motion.